Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carol Zhao vs Raveena Kingsley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zhao vs Kingsley analysis and find out who is favored!
Carol Zhao vs Raveena Kingsley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zhao 1 - 0 Kingsley
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zhao has won 38.36% of points on their second serve, while Kingsley has won 48.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zhao, in recent form, has won 52.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kingsley has won 47.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.19% and 35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zhao has saved 53.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kingsley has saved 41.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zhao has won 44.07% of matches played (W/L 26/ 33), with Kingsley winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zhao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 67/ 50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7). Kingsley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 15/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 81/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Zhao has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20), where as Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zhao winning 1 times and Kingsley being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zhao winning 2 and Kingsley winning 0. The last match between Zhao and Kingsley was at the Guadalajara Open Akron - Guadalajara, 16-09-2023, Q3, Hard with Carol Zhao getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zhao and Kingsley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zhao winning 0 times and Kingsley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zhao winning 0, and Kingsley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zhao has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.71 while Kingsley has played against players with an average rank of 277.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zhao has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kingsley has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zhao has converted 46.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kingsley has converted 41.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
221
Rank
131
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
464
Rank
284
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
52% (252-229)
Career Total W/L
60% (144-96)
37% (10-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$302,158
Career Prize Money
$23,720
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Carol Zhao | Raveena Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:1 | 1:20:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (37/49) | 68% (49/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 53% (26/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (4/12) | 57% (13/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 31% (15/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Carol Zhao
Player
Raveena Kingsley
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carol Zhao | Raveena Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (10/17) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (26/38) | 14% (1/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (287/309) | 39% (26/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (5/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.57 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 168 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:9 | 1:59:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.44 | 316.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1322/1992) | 71% (161/227) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (818/1322) | 52% (84/161) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (257/670) | 50% (33/66) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (110/239) | 42% (8/19) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (885/2003) | 40% (94/234) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (10/27) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 16% (19/3) | 0% (3/0) |
Carol Zhao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Carol Zhao
76%
(
93 of
122)
1st Serve %
71%
(
102 of
143)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
19
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
60 of
102)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
9 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
61 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
74 of
143)
135
Total Points Won
130
|
7-5 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Carol Zhao
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Naho Sato
71%
(
84 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
59 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Mina Miyahara
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Carol Zhao
67%
(
97 of
144)
1st Serve %
65%
(
93 of
143)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
13
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
93)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
56 of
143)
141
Total Points Won
146
|
7-6(8) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Miho Kuramochi
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Sarah Beth Grey
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Carol Zhao
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Carol Zhao
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Raveena Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Raveena Kingsley
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Lodikova
Player
Raveena Kingsley
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kichenok
Player
Raveena Kingsley
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Raveena Kingsley
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Raveena Kingsley
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Rodriguez
Player
Raveena Kingsley
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raveena Kingsley
Player
Amy Zhu
72%
(
82 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
49%
(
56 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Raveena Kingsley
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raveena Kingsley
Player
Haley Giavara
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Raveena Kingsley
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
0-6 7-6(0) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Zhao Vs Kingsley Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
